Commentary: Week of July 11, 2022
Some investors think the US is already in a recession. As recent data has confirmed, we don’t think that’s the case.
Industrial production is up at a rapid pace so far this year, while payrolls have expanded at a monthly pace of 457,000 and the unemployment rate has dropped to 3.6% from 3.9%. Real gross domestic income (Real GDI), a companion to real GDP that is just as accurate, but which arrives a month later, rose at a 1.8% annualized rate in Q1.
Nonetheless, the recession story is out there and some claim that resetting adjustable mortgage rates is going to knock the economic legs out from under consumers. The idea is that with the Fed raising rates rapidly, as the rate on adjustable mortgages reset, homeowners are going to have to make higher payments, which means less money to spend on other goods and services.
Let’s start off by noting the most basic problem with this theory, which is that even if mortgage resets increase some families’ payments, the holders of those mortgages will get the extra payments and their purchasing power will increase. On net, purchasing power should remain unchanged.
But, to be cautious, let’s indulge the reset theory by pretending the extra payments are money that just disappears, with no one on the other side of the transaction. Even then, our calculations show the theory doesn’t add up.
Households have about $12 trillion in mortgage debt, according to the Federal Reserve, so, yes, the top-line number sounds scary. But, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, only 3.7% of these loans are adjustable, or about $450 billion. Now let’s say that one-third of these mortgages reset every year. That’s $150 billion worth of mortgages resetting. Still a big number, still potentially scary.
But when we calculate how much a reset would change the payments on these loans the problem suddenly gets much smaller. An extra two percentage points in interest on $150 billion in debt is $3 billion.
Obviously, the people making these extra $3 billion in payments won’t like it. But the extra payments equal only 0.018% of annualized consumer spending. That’s not a typo. Not 1%, not 0.1%, but only 0.018%. Which means that even if all of the $450 billion in adjustable-rate mortgages reset upward by two percentage points at the same time, we’d be talking about 0.05% of annual consumer spending.
The bottom line is that we think a recession is eventually on the way because monetary policy will have to get tight enough to wrestle inflation back down and that should be tight enough to cause a recession starting in late 2023 or beyond. But those rate hikes won’t work like they did in 2006-07 when nearly half of all mortgages were adjustable in ‘05. The mortgage reset story makes superficial sense. But when you work through the actual numbers, it’s not something to worry about. Seems like a vast majority of homeowners and real estate investors got wise to adjustable mortgages (from nearly 50% of mortgages in 2005 down to less than 4% of mortgages in 2022).
All My Best – jtk
(For transparency, I did not write this. Brian Wesbury and his team authored it. He is an economist that I hold in high regard.)
Not a client and have questions? No worries, there’s no obligation. Click HERE to schedule a pressure-free meeting. You’ll likely hear things that you’ve never heard before. It will definitely be worth your time.
Clients can always call me or click HERE for a convenient time to talk or meet.
* Consensus forecasts come from Bloomberg. This report was prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflects the current opinion of the authors. It is based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
* This newsletter and commentary expressed should not be construed as investment advice.
* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.
* Economic forecasts set forth may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
* Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
* The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee it is accurate or complete.
* There is no guarantee a diversified portfolio will enhance overall returns or outperform a non-diversified portfolio. Diversification does not protect against market risk.
* Asset allocation does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.
* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.
July 11, 2022 – First Trust Monday Morning Outlook by Brian S. Wesbury and his team.