Paste your Google Webmaster Tools verification code here

Commentary: Week of November 27, 2023

When Argentina entered the 20th Century, its prospects looked bright.  On a per person basis, its economy was on par with Canada and Sweden and about two-thirds of the United States.

This all changed in 1946 when the country elected Juan Peron to the presidency.  Peron launched plans to foster social justice through economic redistribution.  The government sector grew rapidly (spending and money printing) and very high inflation (300%+) became the norm.  Standards of living plummeted.

Without a change in policies, inflation could not be eradicated.  Then, in the 1990s, Argentina tried a currency board arrangement where each Argentine peso was backed by one American dollar.  Like the old-fashioned gold standard before the creation of the Federal Reserve, each unit of Argentine currency was backed by something that held its value.  That currency board system worked for about a decade, bringing inflation down to US levels and spurring a decade of solid economic growth.

However, it broke down in 2001-02, largely because government spending never really subsided.  When the government couldn’t print new money, it borrowed.  Investors (correctly) thought politicians would abandon the currency board and let the value of the peso fall at the first sign of economic trouble.   And that’s exactly what happened.

Now Argentina finds itself with another lost decade of growth and hyper-inflation.  Recently, Argentina’s per person GDP stood less than 20% of US levels, and below even Russia.

But last month brought a political earthquake: the presidential election was won in a landslide by Javier Milei, a libertarian economist, and an unbridled and outspoken critic of socialism and supporter of free-market capitalism.

Milei wants to end the Argentine peso and central bank completely and just use the US dollar as the country’s currency.  That way, re-introducing the peso would be very hard, so Argentines could be confident the government wouldn’t devalue again.  He wants to slash government spending, including spending on the social safety net and get rid of lots of government agencies.

Unfortunately, he has his work cut out for him.  Although he’s popular with voters he doesn’t come from a political party with widespread support in the legislative branch.  As a result, it remains to be seen how much Milei can accomplish.

And yet this isn’t the only big shift at the polls in recent months, with voters in New Zealand and the Netherlands swinging toward leaders seeking some major changes.

The long historic battle between those who support wealth creation and those who support wealth redistribution, continues.  The pendulum is starting to swing.  We think much of this recent pattern is due to voters getting fed up with governments that are too big.  Even the election of Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, ostensibly about immigration has a big government component, due to taxpayer-funded resources that, right or wrong, voters think recent immigrants’ demand.

When governments are already very large, and inflation rises while growth suffers, it’s harder for the left to make bigger government appealing to voters, and easier for the right to make trimming government look attractive.

The pendulum is swinging toward smaller government.  If leaders fulfill this desire, investors around the globe will have reason to cheer.  While Argentina has followed a different rhythm than many Western countries, the elections of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan changed the direction of global economic growth.  Is it happening again?

All My Best – jtk

(For transparency, I did not write this.  Brian Wesbury and his team authored it.  He is an economist that I hold in high regard.)

Not a client and have questions?  No worries, there’s no obligation.  Click HERE to schedule a pressure-free meeting. You’ll likely hear things that you’ve never heard before. It will definitely be worth your time.

Clients can always call me or click HERE for a convenient time to talk or meet.

* Consensus forecasts come from Bloomberg. This report was prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflects the current opinion of the authors. It is based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.
* This newsletter and commentary expressed should not be construed as investment advice.

* Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.
* Economic forecasts set forth may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
* Past performance does not guarantee future results. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.
* The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee it is accurate or complete.
* There is no guarantee a diversified portfolio will enhance overall returns or outperform a non-diversified portfolio. Diversification does not protect against market risk.
* Asset allocation does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.
* Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

November 27, 2023 – First Trust Weekly Commentary by Brian S. Wesbury and his team.